Compare

Concrete or Pavers for a Driveway?

Published figures for both, a fair account of what pavers do better, and the question that settles it more often than price does: how would you rather this surface fail?

Updated September 2026 · Burlington Concrete

We pour concrete, so weigh what follows accordingly. You will also notice it does not come out entirely in our favour, because there are situations where pavers are plainly the better buy and any claim otherwise would not survive ten minutes in your own garden.

The published figures, side by side

National ranges from HomeGuide, both read September 2026:

	Poured concrete	Driveway pavers
Per square foot, installed	$6 to $15	$10 to $30
A two-car driveway	$2,400 to $8,600	$5,700 to $17,200
Removing existing concrete first	n/a	adds $2 to $6 per sq ft

Two things are worth pulling out of that. The paver range is far wider than the concrete one, because the units themselves run from $1 to $20 per square foot depending on what you pick, so "pavers" covers a much broader span of product than "concrete" does. And on a replacement job the paver route carries a removal line that a like-for-like concrete replacement also carries, so compare those two honestly rather than assuming one is buried.

Get a free on-site estimate

Where the money actually goes in each

On a paver driveway the published labour figure alone is $6 to $10 per square foot, which on its own approaches the whole installed cost of poured concrete at the lower end. That is not anybody overcharging; it is what placing units individually costs.

Concrete concentrates its cost differently. The material arrives in one or two deliveries and is placed in a morning, so the labour is compressed, and a larger share of the price sits in preparation and in the pour itself. Which means the two respond differently to size: concrete gets proportionally cheaper as an area grows, while pavers scale closer to linearly.

How each one fails, which is the real question

Both surfaces last a long time when built properly. They do not end in the same way, and this is the comparison worth making because it decides what owning the driveway feels like.

Concrete cracks. One plane, jointed so that the inevitable shrinkage lands where somebody chose. Done well it is nearly invisible. Done badly, or where the ground moves, you get a line you can see, and past a certain point a section has to come out and be re-poured. It is a low-maintenance surface that occasionally presents a real bill.

Pavers go uneven. Many small units, so ground movement expresses itself as individual pieces sitting slightly proud or low rather than as a crack. Nothing snaps. What happens instead is a gradual loss of flatness that gets corrected by lifting the affected area, correcting the bedding and re-laying. It is a higher-maintenance surface that rarely presents a large bill.

Put plainly: concrete is quiet for years and then expensive. Pavers are a small ongoing job that seldom becomes a big one. Neither of those is obviously better and people genuinely differ on which they would rather own.

Where pavers are the right answer

• Anything you may need to get under. A run of services, a drain, a soakaway. Pavers lift and go back. Concrete over the same route is a breaker and a patch.
• Ground you already know moves. Where settlement is certain rather than possible, a surface designed to be adjusted beats one designed to resist.
• Where the appearance is the whole point. Borders, curves, colour changes and banding are native to units and are extra work in concrete.
• Phased work. A paver drive can genuinely be laid in stages without a visible join, which a concrete drive cannot.

Where concrete wins in this climate

Snow clearing is the one nobody mentions until February. A blade runs across a continuous surface cleanly; on pavers it catches any unit sitting slightly proud, and over a few winters that is how edges get chipped and units get dragged.

Weeds and joint sand are the other. Every joint in a paver field is somewhere for seed to land and for sand to be washed out of, and that is a spring job forever rather than a one-off.

And on a straightforward rectangular driveway with reasonable ground beneath it, the extra money buys appearance rather than performance. That is a legitimate thing to buy. It is worth knowing that it is what you are buying.

The bit both of them depend on

Whichever material you choose, the excavation and the compacted base underneath are doing most of the work, and a thin base fails both surfaces. A paver drive on poor ground goes wavy within a few seasons. A concrete drive on the same ground cracks and steps.

So if you are comparing quotes across materials, compare the preparation first and the surface second. It is the half nobody can inspect afterwards and the half that decides how long either answer lasts.

The asphalt version of this comparison is in choosing concrete or asphalt. What the concrete route costs here, with assumptions written out, is in the Burlington driveway cost breakdown, and the work is on concrete driveway.